Ekrin Bantam vs Theragun mini 2.0

In this Ekrin Bantam vs Theragun mini 2.0 review, we will compare Ekrin Athletics’ mini massage gun with its equally-sized and recently updated competitor from one of the most popular brands on the market.

Just by looking at them, we can already see a difference. While the Ekrin Bantam uses an ergonomic 15° angled handle, the Theragun mini 2.0 has no handle and comes in a triangle shape instead. But how do they differ on the inside, and which one is the better fit for your needs?

This side-by-side comparison will help you find out.

Comparison: Ekrin Bantam vs Theragun mini 2.0

Amplitude

With an amplitude of 10 mm, the Ekrin Bantam offers a more vibrational, surface-level type of massage experience. The massage head of the Theragun mini 2.0, on the other hand, travels an additional 2 mm into the muscle tissue, making it better suited for a more percussive treatment.

Force

In terms of stall force, it is the Ekrin Bantam that has a clear advantage. Equipped with a powerful brushless motor, it only reaches its limits at around 35 lbs of resistance. This places it not only far above the 20 lbs of the Theragun mini 2.0, but even on par with some normal-sized competitors.

Frequency & Speed Levels

Depending on your preferences, you might prefer the higher maximum frequency of the Ekrin Bantam or the lower minimum of the Theragun mini 2.0. The former comes with a wider range, but the latter allows you to set any number of percussions per minute (ppm) using an app.

Connectivity

Unlike its competitor or its predecessor, the Theragun mini 2.0 can be connected to your smartphone via Bluetooth. This allows you to easily access and follow personalized wellness routines within the Therabody app, set the frequency to the exact level you wish, and more.

Battery

Powered by a Lithium-ion battery from Samsung, the Ekrin Bantam achieves a battery life of up to 6 hours, three times that of the Theragun mini 2.0. That said, with a treatment session not taking longer than a few minutes each, even those 2 hours should get you through several days.

Noise

Despite the higher stall force and maximum frequency, the Ekrin Bantam operates at a maximum noise level of around 58 decibels (dB) compared to around 60 dB for the Theragun mini 2.0. Either way, both models are quiet enough to use at the office or other public places.

Attachments & Accessories

With four interchangeable head attachments as opposed to three, the Ekrin Bantam gives you slightly more possibilities to personalize the massage experience to your exact needs and the muscle group you are about to target next:

• Flat (Silicone): Great for overall use
• Bullet: Pinpoint treatment including hands, feet, and knots
• Fork: Low impact for treating sensitive and sore areas
• Round (Silicone): Designed to treat the spine and neck

It also ships with a bit more sturdy travel case, while the Theragun mini 2.0 includes a soft case.

Weight & Dimensions

In the final round of this Ekrin Bantam vs Theragun mini 2.0 comparison, we will have a quick look at the weight and dimensions of the two devices. At 1.0 lbs (0.45 kg), the Theragun mini 2.0 is slightly lighter. In terms of size, it is a bit wider, while the Ekrin Bantam is a bit lengthier.

Conclusion: Ekrin Bantam vs Theragun mini 2.0

The Ekrin Bantam stands out with its exceptionally high stall force and battery life. It also ships with an additional massage head, as well as a more robust travel case. On top of that, there is the lifetime warranty that Ekrin Athletics is granting on all of its devices.

If you are looking for a mini massage gun that offers a more percussive experience, the Theragun mini 2.0 is the better fit. The Bluetooth functionality allows you to easily follow recovery routines developed by professionals, and to set its speed to the exact level you feel most comfortable at.

---