Theragun mini vs mini 2.0

In this Theragun mini vs mini 2.0 review, we will compare the widely popular, original mini massage gun from market leader Therabody with the recently released version of the second generation.

Both featuring the same ergonomic triangle shape and grip, the two models look pretty similar on the outside. On the inside, however, several changes were made. So should you stick with the first generation, or is it worth it to upgrade to the new Theragun mini?

This side-by-side comparison will help you find out.

Comparison: Theragun mini vs mini 2.0

Amplitude

Both versions of the Theragun mini have an amplitude of 12 mm. This gives them an advantage over most mini massage guns, which mostly come with a stroke length of not more than 10 mm and therefore do not reach as far into the muscle tissue as the Theragun mini does.

Force

There have also been no changes in terms of stall force. Each equipped with a brushless motor, both the first and the second generation of the Theragun mini reach their limits at around 20 lbs of resistance.

Frequency & Speed Levels

Starting at 1,750 percussions per minute (ppm), the Theragun mini 1.0 and 2.0 are able to generate a maximum of 2,400 ppm. With the push of a button, you can switch between three speed settings:

• Level 1: 1,750 ppm
• Level 2: 2,100 ppm
• Level 3: 2,400 ppm

Using the second generation model in combination with the Therabody app, you can even choose any number of ppm and are not limited to the preprogrammed settings (see below).

Connectivity

Just like the Theragun Prime, Elite and PRO, the new Theragun mini can be connected to your smartphone via Bluetooth. This allows you to easily access and follow personalized wellness routines within the Therabody app, set the amount of ppm to the exact level you wish, and more.

Battery

Surprisingly, the Theragun mini of the first generation has a better battery life than its successor. But with at least two hours, both models should last you for several days on one charge. Speaking of charging – while the original mini required a power adapter, the new version now supports convenient USB-C charging.

Noise

Despite having an identical stall force and maximum frequency, the new Theragun mini now operates at around 60 decibels (dB) on the highest speed setting, less than the 65 dB for its predecessor. That said, both models are quiet enough to use at the office or other public places.

Attachments & Accessoires

While the original Theragun mini only includes the Standard Ball attachment, the Theragun mini 2.0 offers you more personalization thanks to three interchangeable head attachments:

• Dampener: The most universal attachment for overall use on most of the body
• Standard Ball: Perfect for overall use on large and small muscle groups
• Thumb: Used mostly for trigger points and the lower back

The new Theragun mini is compatible with all 4th and 5th generation attachments from its bigger brothers. The old version works with all 4th generation attachments. Both ship with a soft case.

Weight & Dimensions

In the last round of this Theragun mini vs mini 2.0 comparison, we will have a quick look at the weight and dimensions of the two devices. Now about 20% smaller and 30% lighter than the previous generation, the new Theragun mini is an even better choice for a life on-the-go.

Conclusion: Theragun mini vs mini 2.0

What was already a great mini massage gun became even better with the Theragun mini 2.0. Not only is it significantly smaller and lighter than its predecessor, but also more customizable thanks to the additional attachments and Bluetooth support. Lastly, we also like the switch to USB-C charging.

That said, in important categories such as amplitude and stall force, the Theragun mini 1.0 doesn’t lack behind the new generation at all. When it comes to battery life, it even has the upper hand. So if you don’t mind the lack of massage heads and connectivity features, it might still be a great fit for you.

---

Frequently Asked Questions